I’ve seen a lot of posts lately where people are panicking because they missed a deadline or didn’t realize their status expired—only to find out they might still be able to restore it, but only if they act within 90 days. But here’s the thing: the 90-day clock doesn’t start when you get a decision on your extension application. It starts on the *exact day* your previous status ended.

For example, if your visitor record expired on June 10th, the 90-day window to apply for restoration starts on June 11th—not when IRCC finally responds to your extension request. That’s a common misunderstanding, and it can cost someone their chance to stay legally in Canada.

While out of status, you can’t work, can’t access most public benefits, and you’re not allowed to travel outside Canada unless you’ve applied for restoration *before* leaving. But if you’re still in Canada and your application is submitted within 90 days of expiry, you may be able to resume your status.

The key is being precise. You’ll need to:
- Pinpoint the exact date your status ended (check your old visitor record or landing paper)
- Confirm when you submitted your restoration application (keep proof of submission)
- Gather all supporting documents—like proof of ties to Canada, financial support, and a clear explanation for the delay

But here’s the reality: restoration isn’t guaranteed. IRCC will assess your case on its merits, and if your application is late, they’ll likely reject it. That’s why planning ahead matters.

So I’m curious—what would you check first if you were in this situation?
- Would you start by verifying the exact expiry date, or look at your previous documents first?
- What kind of proof do you think carries the most weight in a restoration case?
- And if you had to reapply after a refusal, what would your next steps be?

If you’ve been through this or are thinking about it, share what you’d prioritize and what details you’d make sure to get right. Let’s help each other stay on track.