What should people check before trusting LMIA-related advice online?
LMIA advice online can be risky because people may mix employer compliance, PR points, closed work permits, job offers, and illegal job-selling schemes. A forum discussion should help people ask better questions, not encourage shortcuts or paid fake employment. Specific questions worth discussing: What signs suggest LMIA advice is unreliable? How can workers verify whether a claim comes from an official source, a licensed professional, or an anonymous post? What should people do if someone offers a job or LMIA for money? What facts are safe to discuss publicly? If replying with a similar situation, include the province or city, current status, key dates, program, job, family, housing, or healthcare details when relevant, and the official source or institution page being checked. Please do not post private documents, UCI numbers, passport details, bank account information, medical records, employer names, or full addresses. For reference value, try to separate confirmed facts from assumptions and mention when the answer may depend on timing, province, document wording, or the person’s exact status. This is a community discussion starter, not legal advice. Please check official requirements or speak with a qualified professional when needed.
Lukeyesterday 23:22
Editorial follow-up: For employer-related topics, keep the discussion factual: current permit expiry, role type, wage or duties in broad terms, employer process stage, and whether documents are written or verbal. Do not name the employer or share contracts publicly. If sharing a similar situation, add what changed since the last official page or institution guidance was checked. That keeps the reply useful without turning it into personal advice or a prediction. Short context beats long private evidence in public replies.
Follow us